On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:40:00 +0200, Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl> wrote: > >> I've been thinking a bit about whether or not we should split the section >> on HTTP implementation > > I would support splitting out or removing the HTTP section, on the basis > that we do not intend to implement it. When/if we implement MF it will be > client-side only, relying only on byte range requests. But that's what 5.2.1 describes, so why remove it? Also, the spec is not just for browsers - it is for all sw that intends to support MF URIs. Why remove things now just before the spec gets into the hands of implementers? It's just a CR and not a PR. Silvia.Received on Thursday, 16 June 2011 11:51:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:43 GMT