W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > January 2011

Re: ACTION-207: Poll regarding the fact that RTSP will be discussed in a separate note

From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 08:51:40 -0800
Cc: Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, RaphaŽl Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Message-Id: <A668C960-4224-412C-ACC7-F71FB2E40371@apple.com>
To: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
me too

On Dec 28, 2010, at 13:46 , Jack Jansen wrote:

> 
> On  24-Dec-2010, at 15:05 , Davy Van Deursen wrote:
> 
>> Same here, an appendix or a separate document doesn't matter for me. As long as RTSP can be published while at the same time we can reach CR in January.
> 
> 
> Same for me.
> 
> I see a slight procedural advantage to a separate note, namely that that note will disappear when it is eventually superseded by a true standards track document, where this is a bit difficult for an appendix of the spec. OTOH, having the RTSP stuff together with the other MF stuff is a win for implementors. And the chance that RTSP-MF would get standardised separately from MF 2.0 is probably very small anyway.
> --
> Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack
> If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman
> 
> 
> 

David Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Monday, 3 January 2011 16:52:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:40 GMT