W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > September 2010

Re: ACTION-187: extensibility and parsing

From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:56:34 +0200
Message-ID: <4CA2FF42.8090509@eurecom.fr>
To: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
CC: public-media-fragment@w3.org
Dear all,

I observe a clear consensus from everyone who has expressed an opinion 
for the option number 2 sketched by Philip. We will resolve this on 
today's telecon.

> Sure, I could write some spec text. As an FYI, These are the options I see:
> 1. Just use the ABNF we have now and let parsing be completely separate
> from it.
> 2. Define a name-value syntax and say that parsers should use that to
> get name-value pairs (simple because it's equivalent to splitting on &
> and =). Then say that a valid Media Fragment is one where all the names
> and values match the dimensions and their corresponding syntax.
> I'll not go further into discussion about these spec-writing details, as
> the purpose of this thread is to reach consensus on how parsing should
> work, and thus what kind of extensibility we get.

You might get another action today's following these suggestions :-)
Thanks, ACTION-187 is done.


Raphaël Troncy
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2010 08:59:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:45 UTC