W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > September 2010

RE: Timeline to Last Call

From: Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:10:54 +0200
To: "'Silvia Pfeiffer'" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Cc: "'Media Fragment'" <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001c01cb5b42$487d4710$d977d530$@ugent.be>
Hi Silvia,

> as the HTML spec is moving to last call, we should probably get more active in having the media fragment URI uses integrated into
> I have forwarded the timeline that they are proposing to follow.
> The key right now is that we should probably register a bug in the bug tracker for any spec text that we want to see entered for
> fragment support. The deadline is 1st October.
> I am concretely thinking about:
> * support for temporal media fragment URIs in the @src attributes of media elements and what effect they have.
> * the use of spatial media fragment URIs in the @src attribute of img elements.
> What do ppl think? Maybe at OVC/FOMS the groups of us that is there can have a chat about it?

What is the reason to pick only a subset of the spec? For instance, why no spatial fragment URIs in the media elements and what
about track media fragment URIs?

Best regards,


Davy Van Deursen

Ghent University - IBBT
Department of Electronics and Information Systems - Multimedia Lab
URL: http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be/dvdeurse
Received on Thursday, 23 September 2010 17:18:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:45 UTC