W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > September 2010

Re: minutes of 2010-09-08 teleconference

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 23:27:20 +1000
Message-ID: <AANLkTincX3shmvzwFczoUVerTKdnD=Pj+JfhR=4N6sPf@mail.gmail.com>
To: RaphaŽl Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
Cc: Erik Mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>, public-media-fragment@w3.org
2010/9/9 RaphaŽl Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>

> Dear all,
> I'm going back to what has been scribed during the telecon, and this is a
> question to Ian (Hickson)) via Silvia :-)
>  Yves: in that case we are not controlling what is presented to the user
>> silvia: the WHATWG doesn't want to specify the presentation of media
>> fragment URIs in the HTML spec, but wants it to be in our spec
>> Ö that's where it belongs in their mind
> Can Ian provide a pointer to a paragraph in any of the HTML spec (including
> the HTML5 current draft) where it is written that a browser MUST jump to the
> section identified by a (resolvable) frag id for an HTML document? This is
> the standard behavior in all browsers, right? However, I cannot find where
> it has ever been written ... Why would this be different for media
> resources?

It's here:
It had to be included because the specification of what to do with fragment
identifiers in URLs to text/html resources should have been in
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2854.txt, but isn't.

Received on Thursday, 9 September 2010 13:28:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:45 UTC