- From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 14:53:22 +0200
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- CC: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Hi Silvia, > If it's a 200 or a 206 - they are both successes - that's all that > counts. Not hard to check for these two alternatives. I'm just > flagging what will happen in reality on the 'net. So pushing the line a bit further: a legacy browser as of today, that always send a normal request ignoring the media fragment, retrieve the whole resource, will also be compliant with the Media Fragment URI spec? So why bother implementing it? :-) Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2010 12:55:09 UTC