W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > May 2010

Re: Test Cases: moving forward

From: RaphaŽl Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 14:53:22 +0200
Message-ID: <4BFBC842.5090609@eurecom.fr>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
CC: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Hi Silvia,

> If it's a 200 or a 206 - they are both successes - that's all that
> counts. Not hard to check for these two alternatives. I'm just
> flagging what will happen in reality on the 'net.

So pushing the line a bit further: a legacy browser as of today, that 
always send a normal request ignoring the media fragment, retrieve the 
whole resource, will also be compliant with the Media Fragment URI spec? 
So why bother implementing it? :-)

   RaphaŽl

-- 
RaphaŽl Troncy
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
2229, route des CrÍtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2010 12:55:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:38 GMT