W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > May 2010

Re: Test Cases: moving forward

From: RaphaŽl Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 22:49:51 +0200
Message-ID: <4BF44EEF.603@eurecom.fr>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
CC: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Hi Silvia,

>>   - For #11, #12, #14 and #16: I suggest we force a 206 answer, with the
>> rationale that a fragment has been requested (that might be equal to the
>> entire resource but this is similar to case #01!).
>
> It's not really up to us, but it's up to the UA. As the UA will have
> to retrieve the full resource, the question is whether it wants to
> retrieve the resource in byte ranges or in one go. I have formulated
> this better in the spec actually.

We have further discussed this during today's telecon, but for the 
record: my rationale is that as soon as a Range request is issued, a 206 
Partial Content should be returned. Therefore, the problem amounts to 
whether the UA should issue a Range request at all when it notices the 
fragment will be equal to the entire resource.

I understand the good will of optimizing the communication between the 
UA and the server but I think we should not put too far away the 
intelligence that the UA should have.

   RaphaŽl

-- 
RaphaŽl Troncy
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
2229, route des CrÍtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2010 20:51:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:38 GMT