- From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 09:21:33 +0200
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- CC: Eric Carlson <eric.carlson@apple.com>, Jeroen Wijering <jeroen@longtailvideo.com>, public-media-fragment@w3.org
Dear all, Le 04/05/2010 03:22, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit : > Incidentally, reaching the HAVE_METADATA state will also be a > precursor to some of the cases that the MF spec identifies, such as: > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/#processing-protocol-UA-mapped > orhttp://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/#processing-protocol-Server-mapped > . Thus it's not unreasonable to deal with this condition for certain > usage cases. Indeed! And I think we should write this explicitly in the spec as each time I explained the work of the Media Fragments WG in a presentation, I get this as a question. Who wants to edit the spec to mention this? Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 4 May 2010 07:23:05 UTC