Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response from Silvia Pfeiffer on 2010-03-05 (public-media-fragment@w3.org from March 2010)

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:25:35 +1100
To: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
Cc: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2c0e02831003041925g2762aec8ga7be98620f4c87b7@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl> wrote:
>
> On 4 mrt 2010, at 02:14, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>> Raphael's question was not a question that poses itself in that
>> manner. The Multipart bit is already defined for retrieval actions
>> that create multiple byte ranges as a reply rather than just one. So,
>> these are complimentary options, not alternatives!!!
>
>
> Duh.
> I stand corrected, next time I'll read more of the spec than just the bits I think are relevant at first glance:-)
>
> I'll read things more carefully before monday and form another opinion on the issue,

I blame Raphael ;-)

S.

Received on Friday, 5 March 2010 03:26:30 UTC