W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > June 2010

Re: Media Fragments URI parsing: pseudo algorithm code

From: RaphaŽl Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 12:00:29 +0200
Message-ID: <4C2B15BD.9000304@eurecom.fr>
To: Philip Jšgenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
CC: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Dear Philip,

> This is the version I'm looking at:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-media-frags-20100624/

This is the good version to look at.

> I will continue to bring up the issue of well-defined processing until
> it is resolved. MF is a small spec and it's not difficult to define
> achieve interoperability. That means that it should be possible for two
> different implementors to read the spec and implement two different
> parsers that have the exact same result for all possible input, valid or
> not. Without that, the spec shouldn't progress to Last Call. As usual, I
> don't care much what spec writing style is used to achieve this, as long
> as it is achieved.

Thanks for insisting on this point. We will continue to discuss this 
issue until we got a resolution that satisfies everybody. At this point, 
we are asking further information from Yves about what the URI RFC 
already says regarding where pct-encoded is allowed or not.

   RaphaŽl

-- 
RaphaŽl Troncy
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
2229, route des CrÍtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Wednesday, 30 June 2010 10:08:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:39 GMT