On 29 jun 2010, at 22:30, Yves Lafon wrote: > The ABNF describe the whole syntax, and then the different parts. There is no need for a multi-step parsing scheme requiring to re-read multiple time the same bytes. > To me "%74=%6ept%3A%310" is not a media fragment. %-escaped values are allowed only where they are allowed (see grammar). Interesting... Unlike Yves, I think the sketched example _is_ a media fragment, but unlike Philip I don't think we need to specify it in our ABNF. My reasoning: the URI spec (or possibly IRI spec, if we decide to go with that one) already specifies how percent-escapes are handled. But: I know we had long discussions about this, so maybe my memory is incorrect here. Please enlighten me... -- Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma GoldmanReceived on Tuesday, 29 June 2010 20:44:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:39 GMT