W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > June 2010

Re: ACTION-178: Review the complete document, remove unnecessary editorial notes before publication (Media Fragments Working Group)

From: RaphaŽl Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:33:26 +0200
Message-ID: <4C21C6D6.1050603@eurecom.fr>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
CC: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, Media Fragments Working Group WG <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Hi all,

Specific message on multiple tracks. I must play the memory of the group
since we have discussed this already and people don't look at the
resolution page :-)

> Yes, multiple tracks. But how? Through multiple track parameters or
> through one with semicolon-separated elements? I cannot remember
> whether we made an actual decision on that. Once somebody clarifies
> this for me, I can fix it either way. I would personally prefer them
> all in one track parameter, since that will make the different
> dimensions more consistent.


I quote:
"The WG resolved on 2010/03/09  that the media fragment URI will allow 
multiple values for the track dimension, using multiple occurrence of 
the keyword 'track' (e.g.: #track=audio&track=video). (Note that this 
explicitly contradicts a resolution we had on 2010/03/08  that is now 

Evidence of the decision, see: 
http://www.w3.org/2010/03/09-mediafrag-minutes.html#item01 We say that 
we will use multiple occurrences of the word 'track'.


RaphaŽl Troncy
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
2229, route des CrÍtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2010 08:35:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:45 UTC