W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > June 2010

Re: grammar extraction

From: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:41:50 +0200
Cc: public-media-fragment@w3.org
Message-Id: <CF41FB3D-4E43-4A03-BFF3-0846DBAEA06D@cwi.nl>
To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>

On 21 jun 2010, at 09:41, Yves Lafon wrote:

> During last f2f, we discussed about the possibility to isolate common part of the grammar between header syntax and URI syntax.
> However the common part would be external definition and at most the time part without the units, like 'frametime' or 'clocktime' (the unit in the header needs a specific entry to avoid implied LWS).
> So it is worth doing? (Jack, any input?)
> (tracker this is about ACTION-174)

There's the few "real" nonterminals you sketch, but also a couple that are really indirectly-defined terminals, such as timeprefix, trackprefix, trackparam, etc.

It's not important, really: if you feel it isn't worth doing then let's forget about it.

Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack
If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman
Received on Monday, 21 June 2010 08:42:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:45 UTC