W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > June 2010

Re: 206 and extra headers

From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@cwi.nl>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 10:27:12 +0200
Message-ID: <4C0DFEE0.4020208@cwi.nl>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
CC: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, public-media-fragment@w3.org
Hi Slvia, Yves,

> I'm going to have to step back and try and understand this from the
> ground up. This explanation is a bit too dense for me. :-)

Thanks a lot! Your long post helped me to understand the issue :-) In a 
nutshell, I come to the same conclusion than you Silvia, that is:

> I honestly fail to construct a situation where we would use If-Range
> with non-byte-ranges, but please try.

... except for one case, that is perhaps what Yves had in mind: the case 
where the UA has just received the first bytes of the resources that 
allows to decode the media (e.g. section 5.2.1 in our doc). Is it a 
boundary case?

Furthermore, should we write down explicitly in the specification the 
variant that Silvia has just made in case the connexion is broken and a 
If-Range could be used in a subsequent request?
Cheers.

   Raphaël

-- 
Raphaël Troncy
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2010 08:30:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:39 GMT