W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > January 2010

Re: spec review

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:55:49 +0100
Message-ID: <4B601BB5.3040808@w3.org>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
CC: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr, Philip Jšgenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, public-media-fragment@w3.org
Silvia,

The issue is on TR space.

http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-media-frags-reqs-20091217/
is delivered Fine


while
http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags-reqs/
(which  should be only an alias to the same document is not served properly.

It is indeed a server setup issue.


Thierry


 > (http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags-reqs/) is being delivered by the Web
 > server as:
 >
 > Content-Type	text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
But

Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
> The file that displays incorrectly
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags-reqs/) is being delivered by the Web
> server as:
> 
> Content-Type	text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> while the same file from
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-reqs/ is
> being delivered as:
> 
> Content-Type	text/html; charset=utf-8
> 
> I think it may be a server setup for this file.
> 
> Cheers,
> Silvia.
> 
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
>> I have requested to Webreq (Webmaster) to fix this encoding issue.
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags-reqs/
>> Only the webmaster can fix documents on TR space.
>>
>>
>> The document was fine on publication (checked by webmaster and conformant to
>> publication rules).
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-media-frags-reqs-20091217
>>
>> it is still fine, but curiously the  alias done by the webmaster pointing to
>> the same document is showing encoding issues
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags-reqs/
>>
>>
>> Thierry
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> RaphaŽl Troncy wrote:
>>> Hi Philip,
>>>
>>>> I've hacked away at the spec and have something I want comments on. What
>>>> can I do to make it available for all to see, short of putting it on my
>>>> own webserver? Checking it in on a CVS branch seems sane, but would it
>>>> be possible for others to view the results?
>>> To clarify that:
>>>  - the documents published in the /TR space if frozen and has been
>>> approved by the group prior to its publication (e.g.
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags-reqs/).
>>>  - the documents published in our group space are evolving, non stable,
>>> they are our working draft (I need to change the css to show that), (e.g.
>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-reqs/). You can
>>> change the later as you wish. Commit directly in cvs. Send a mail to the
>>> mailing list and make sure your changes are discussed by the group in a
>>> upcoming telecon. We can reverse back these changes if not approved.
>>>
>>>  RaphaŽl
>>>
>>
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 10:56:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:37 GMT