- From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:21:34 +0100
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- CC: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Hi Silvia, Thanks for this very valuable report from FOMS. > After it was understood what the spec is about, it was suggested we > split out those sections that are already stable and move those that > are still in the works into a draft for later release. Thus, we can > create a first, simple "versions" that can be implemented in full > right now. I understand the need for the developers to be informed of what is stable in a evolving spec and what is not, but I'm not a big fan of splitting documents. Our charter tells what the 1.0 version should cover. I would rather suggest we mark explicitly in our document the sections that we consider are stable giving a clear 'go' to web developers to start implement them and mark as unstable the sections we are actively working on. > The current version 1 should be focused on only client-side temporal > url addressing with URI fragments and should be published soon, since > it's simple to implement. > > In version 1.1 we could further sort through other temporal > fragmentation URI approaches. What do you mean exactly by 'other temporal fragmentation URI approaches'? Cheers. Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 09:22:21 UTC