W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Feedback from FOMS

From: RaphaŽl Troncy <raphael.troncy@cwi.nl>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:21:34 +0100
Message-ID: <4B60059E.20000@cwi.nl>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
CC: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Hi Silvia,

Thanks for this very valuable report from FOMS.

> After it was understood what the spec is about, it was suggested we
> split out those sections that are already stable and move those that
> are still in the works into a draft for later release. Thus, we can
> create a first, simple "versions" that can be implemented in full
> right now.

I understand the need for the developers to be informed of what is 
stable in a evolving spec and what is not, but I'm not a big fan of 
splitting documents. Our charter tells what the 1.0 version should 
cover. I would rather suggest we mark explicitly in our document the 
sections that we consider are stable giving a clear 'go' to web 
developers to start implement them and mark as unstable the sections we 
are actively working on.

> The current version 1 should be focused on only client-side temporal
> url addressing with URI fragments and should be published soon, since
> it's simple to implement.
>
> In version 1.1 we could further sort through other temporal
> fragmentation URI approaches.

What do you mean exactly by 'other temporal fragmentation URI approaches'?
Cheers.

   RaphaŽl

-- 
RaphaŽl Troncy
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
2229, route des CrÍtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 09:22:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:37 GMT