W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Temporal fragments of media with time stamps

From: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:06:14 +0100
Cc: "'Bailer, Werner'" <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>, <public-media-fragment@w3.org>, "'Richard Wright-ARCHIVES'" <richard.wright@bbc.co.uk>
Message-Id: <1FA8B173-7953-426A-8716-1F5232E6B72E@cwi.nl>
To: Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>

On 16 jan 2010, at 10:25, Davy Van Deursen wrote:
> Temporal fragments should indeed take into account embedded time stamps.
> Note that this is already stated in the specification [1].
> Best regards,
> Davy
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/#processing-overview-interpretation  

Thanks for finding this one!

But: this means that we have to look through the protocol description with this in mind. 

If I have a video http://www.example.com/example.mp4, which has 10 seconds worth of video, with timestamps 01:00:00:00 through 01:00:10:00, and a UA sends a request
	Range: t:smpte=01:00:05:00-01:00:06:00
what does it get back in the Content-Range header?
I would assume the timestamps are as expected, but what is the duration returned? 
Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack
If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman
Received on Sunday, 17 January 2010 23:06:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:44 UTC