- From: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:06:14 +0100
- To: Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>
- Cc: "'Bailer, Werner'" <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>, <public-media-fragment@w3.org>, "'Richard Wright-ARCHIVES'" <richard.wright@bbc.co.uk>
On 16 jan 2010, at 10:25, Davy Van Deursen wrote: > > Temporal fragments should indeed take into account embedded time stamps. > Note that this is already stated in the specification [1]. > > Best regards, > > Davy > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/#processing-overview-interpretation Thanks for finding this one! But: this means that we have to look through the protocol description with this in mind. If I have a video http://www.example.com/example.mp4, which has 10 seconds worth of video, with timestamps 01:00:00:00 through 01:00:10:00, and a UA sends a request with Range: t:smpte=01:00:05:00-01:00:06:00 what does it get back in the Content-Range header? I would assume the timestamps are as expected, but what is the duration returned? -- Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman
Received on Sunday, 17 January 2010 23:06:56 UTC