W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > February 2010

Re: ABNF or code fragments?

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:56:09 -0500 (EST)
To: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
cc: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1002240353300.13114@wnl.j3.bet>
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:

>> in the foot if they want, but http://www.example.com/foo#%74=1 is just 
>> _not_ a media fragment URI.
> It's not *valid* (IIRC, "unnecessary" percent escaping is invalid per the URI 
> spec) but the current processing rules will handle this case as percent


Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 08:56:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:44 UTC