W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > February 2010

Re: Track fragments

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:53:04 +1100
Message-ID: <2c0e02831002180253r3d0bdd8cn56067406f6d06c7b@mail.gmail.com>
To: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr
Cc: Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>, DENOUAL Franck <Franck.Denoual@crf.canon.fr>, public-media-fragment@w3.org
2010/2/18 RaphaŽl Troncy <raphael.troncy@cwi.nl>:
>>> [1]
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/ImplementationExperiment#Segm
>>> ents_via_the_HTTP_Range_header
>>
>> Sorry, I should have known - have read those docs before.
>> Cool to see it implemented and working!
>>
>> I noticed one difference: As you used "time" instead of "t" on the
>> protocol level, we should adapt the spec to use that, too, IMO. More
>> readable anyway.
>
> Re [1] ... or the other way around :-)
> But let's first Yves complete his action 123,
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/123

Yup, we have a draft at
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/WG_Resolutions#Media_Fragment_Headers
, but it's not yet in the spec. I do vote for the more readable "time"
than what is currently in the examples in the spec (which,
incidentally, I put there originally ;-).

Cheers,
Silvia.
Received on Thursday, 18 February 2010 10:53:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:37 GMT