- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:53:04 +1100
- To: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr
- Cc: Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>, DENOUAL Franck <Franck.Denoual@crf.canon.fr>, public-media-fragment@w3.org
2010/2/18 Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@cwi.nl>: >>> [1] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/ImplementationExperiment#Segm >>> ents_via_the_HTTP_Range_header >> >> Sorry, I should have known - have read those docs before. >> Cool to see it implemented and working! >> >> I noticed one difference: As you used "time" instead of "t" on the >> protocol level, we should adapt the spec to use that, too, IMO. More >> readable anyway. > > Re [1] ... or the other way around :-) > But let's first Yves complete his action 123, > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/123 Yup, we have a draft at http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/WG_Resolutions#Media_Fragment_Headers , but it's not yet in the spec. I do vote for the more readable "time" than what is currently in the examples in the spec (which, incidentally, I put there originally ;-). Cheers, Silvia.
Received on Thursday, 18 February 2010 10:53:57 UTC