W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > February 2010

Re: marking some sections as "ready for implementation"

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 12:15:21 +1100
Message-ID: <2c0e02831002031715s2b25dea0qbea3919e2bb9cf4c@mail.gmail.com>
To: Conrad Parker <conrad@metadecks.org>
Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Conrad Parker <conrad@metadecks.org> wrote:
> On 3 February 2010 22:02, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I guess the only requirement is that the UA doesn't retrieve the full
>> resource since that is counter-productive. This normally implies byte range
>> requests.
>> But I made it deliberately informative so what you say applies.
> I think we have the opportunity to make a normative statement that a
> player which is capable of seeking by itself should do so for #t=
> fragments.

Agreed, but that's not what I meant. I referred to the means of
resolving the #t= fragment - that should be informative.

Received on Thursday, 4 February 2010 01:16:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:44 UTC