Re: marking some sections as "ready for implementation"

On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Conrad Parker <conrad@metadecks.org> wrote:
> On 3 February 2010 22:02, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I guess the only requirement is that the UA doesn't retrieve the full
>> resource since that is counter-productive. This normally implies byte range
>> requests.
>>
>> But I made it deliberately informative so what you say applies.
>
> I think we have the opportunity to make a normative statement that a
> player which is capable of seeking by itself should do so for #t=
> fragments.

Agreed, but that's not what I meant. I referred to the means of
resolving the #t= fragment - that should be informative.

Cheers,
Silvia.

Received on Thursday, 4 February 2010 01:16:14 UTC