W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > December 2010

Re: ACTION-207: Poll regarding the fact that RTSP will be discussed in a separate note

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:13:09 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=CpPW5DYF_n-A1dSo_Sb0KVUDxzqLgRz_TemTu@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Cc: RaphaŽl Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Yes, that confused me, too. You basically have to repeat the question
at the top just before the yes/no choice to make it mean something:
Should the processing of Media Fragment URI over the RTSP protocol be
described in a separate document with the status of a WG Note?

Cheers,
Silvia.

2010/12/21 David Singer <singer@apple.com>:
> The poll outlines 3 possibilities, and then has a yes/no possibility to answer, and there is no question (no question mark), so I find myself unable to answer!
>
>
> On Dec 14, 2010, at 15:04 , RaphaŽl Troncy wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Regarding ACTION-207, please answer the following poll as soon as possible: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/42785/rtsp-processing/
>>
>> The processing of media fragments URI over RTSP are currently described at http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/UA_Server_RTSP_Communication while http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Jun/0065.html is also a useful read.
>> Best regards.
>>
>> †RaphaŽl
>>
>> --
>> RaphaŽl Troncy
>> EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
>> 2229, route des CrÍtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
>> e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
>> Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
>> Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
>> Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
>>
>
> David Singer
> Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2010 02:14:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:40 GMT