- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:43:35 +1100
- To: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Cc: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr> wrote: > Hi Yves, > > Thanks for the feedback. > >> It is not about validation but about generation rules, if you can adapt >> something along the lines of >> >> "The formal grammar describe what producers of media fragment should >> output. It is not taking into account possible percent-encoding that are >> valid according to rfc3896. The grammar is not a specification on how a >> media fragment should be parsed, See section 5.1 for the Parsing rules..." > > Indeed. The new paragraph now reads: > > "The formal grammar defined in the section 4 Media Fragments Syntax > describes what producers of media fragment should output. It is not taking > into account possible percent-encoding that are valid according to RFC 3986 > and the grammar is not a specification of how a media fragment should be > parsed. Therefore, we present in the section 5.1 Processing Media Fragment > URI how a media fragment URI could be parsed." Yup, that's much better. Silvia.
Received on Wednesday, 15 December 2010 12:44:28 UTC