W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > April 2010

Re: No phonebridge, so another cancellation

From: Amy van der Hiel <amy@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:09:25 -0400
Cc: Amy van der Hiel <amy@w3.org>, adminreq adminreq <adminreq@w3.org>, erik mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Message-Id: <D20120C1-0868-44EF-A468-B1F253D7AD77@w3.org>
To: tmichel@w3.org
Hi Thierry,

I only cancelled the MAWG calls, or meant to. If MFWG got cancelled mistakenly and it was my fault I do apologize.

best,
Amy


On Apr 28, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Thierry MICHEL wrote:

> Amy,
> 
> 
> There is a confusion here.
> I acknowledged the cancellation for the *MA WG* (Media Annotation WG) as It was holding a F2F at the same time slot (using the same passcode). But no cancellation for the IA_MFWG (Media Fragment WG) which by the way uses a different code than the MAWG.
> 
> Best
> 
> Thierry.
> 
> 
> 
> Amy van der Hiel wrote:
>> Hi Thierry, In my 22 April mail confirming the F2F bridge reservation to you I stated:
>> "Note: in order to use the same passcode for the F2F I had to cancel the recurring the MA WG calls on Tuesday 4/27 at 11am and on 4/28 at 9am (for F2F meetings it's always helpful for us to know if we can cancel recurring meetings which overlap). "
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Team/adminreq/2010Apr/0080.html
>> On 23 April you acknowledged the cancellation in your reply.  You did not let me know that the group wanted this recurring call in addition to the F2F but confirmed the bridge was still reserved for the following week, 4 May. No change was requested. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Team/adminreq/2010Apr/0081.html
>> best,
>> Amy
>> On Apr 28, 2010, at 6:22 AM, Thierry MICHEL wrote:
>>> 
>>> erik mannens wrote:
>>>> Dear all,
>>>> Unfortunately today our phonebridge was not booked, so another cancellation
>>>> Iím afraid. Now, to get things rolling again (itís almost June!), I expect
>>>> the following by next week:
>>>> @Yves, Thierry: are we scheduled from now on (i.e: was it a 1-time hiccup?)
>>> For some unknowable reason Zakim was not reserved on April 28th.
>>> 
>>> It was reserved for April 21st [1] and also is for every wednesday in May [2]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> AMY,
>>> 
>>> Do you know why Zakim was not reserved this week for the IA_MFWG?
>>> This is a recurring reservation every week.
>>> 
>>> Is this issue due to your reservation of the IA_MAWG(F2F) at the same time slot ?
>>> http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar.html#D20100428
>>> 
>>> Please let us know to understand the issue.
>>> 
>>> best,
>>> 
>>> Thierry.
>>> 
>>> [1]
>>> http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar.html#D20100421
>>> 
>>> [2]
>>> http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar.html#D20100505
>>> http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar.html#D20100512
>>> http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar.html#D20100519
>>> http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar.html#D20100526
>>> 
>>> 
>> --
>> Amy van der Hiel
>> W3C/MIT
>> 32 Vassar Street, G532
>> Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
>> phone: +1.617.253.5628
>> fax: +1.617.258.5999
>> amy@w3.org
> 

--
Amy van der Hiel
W3C/MIT
32 Vassar Street, G532
Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
phone: +1.617.253.5628
fax: +1.617.258.5999
amy@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:09:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:38 GMT