W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > September 2009

Re: time range request/response syntax (Re: minutes of 2009-09-17 F2F meeting, Day 1)

From: Conrad Parker <conrad@metadecks.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:14:37 +0900
Message-ID: <dba6c0830909180314s63a462bcve44cff847519b85c@mail.gmail.com>
To: RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>, Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
2009/9/18 RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>:
>>> †- RESOLUTION: Content-Range <dimension> [':' <unit>] ' ' <real start
>>> time>
>>> '-' <real end time> '/' <total dimension> is the syntax to be used for a
>>> Range Request for the temporal dimension
>>
>> just noticed: only the response header should include the "/<total
>> dimension>" portion, not the request header.
>
> Yes, since it is the Content-Range header, this is in the response. I have
> updated the RESOLUTION page to clarify that. It now reads:
>
> * The WG resolved on 2009/09/17 that the syntax for expressing a Range
> request (using the HTTPBis clarification for having custom units), for the
> temporal dimension, is:
>
> †Range: <unit> '=' <start time> - <end time>
>
> while the response will be:
>
> †Content-Range: <dimension> [':' <unit>] ' ' <real start time> '-' <real end
> time> '/' <total dimension>
>
> See
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/WG_Resolutions#Media_Fragment_Headers
> and complain if it's wrong :-)

great, thanks!

I've updated the time range examples at:

http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/HTTP_Examples

please let me know if I missed any :)

Conrad.

> Cheers.
>
> †RaphaŽl
>
> --
> RaphaŽl Troncy
> EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
> 2229, route des CrÍtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
> e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
> Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
> Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
> Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
>
>
Received on Friday, 18 September 2009 10:15:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:34 GMT