W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > September 2009

Re: Range syntax

From: RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:59:04 +0200
Message-ID: <4AAA1158.7040700@cwi.nl>
To: DENOUAL Franck <Franck.Denoual@crf.canon.fr>
CC: "public-media-fragment@w3.org" <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Hi Frank,

> Content-Range: xywh 160,120,320,240/4:00:00
> Content-Range: xywh:pixel 160,120,320,240/4:00
> Content-Range: xywh:percent 25,25,50,50/4:00
> 
> I think that for Content-Range, it would be more coherent to have the 
> same unit between the range and the instance length:
> 
> ie: Content-Range: <spatialarea> ' ' <topleftx> ',' <toplefty>',' 
> <width>',' <height>
>                 '/' <total width>','<total_heigth>

Very good question! That's why I think Yves just work out the temporal 
dimension so far :-) So what should be the instance-length when using 
the spatial, track and name dimensions?

   RaphaŽl

-- 
RaphaŽl Troncy
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
2229, route des CrÍtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
Received on Friday, 11 September 2009 08:59:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:34 GMT