- From: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:59:04 +0200
- To: DENOUAL Franck <Franck.Denoual@crf.canon.fr>
- CC: "public-media-fragment@w3.org" <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Hi Frank, > Content-Range: xywh 160,120,320,240/4:00:00 > Content-Range: xywh:pixel 160,120,320,240/4:00 > Content-Range: xywh:percent 25,25,50,50/4:00 > > I think that for Content-Range, it would be more coherent to have the > same unit between the range and the instance length: > > ie: Content-Range: <spatialarea> ' ' <topleftx> ',' <toplefty>',' > <width>',' <height> > '/' <total width>','<total_heigth> Very good question! That's why I think Yves just work out the temporal dimension so far :-) So what should be the instance-length when using the spatial, track and name dimensions? Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
Received on Friday, 11 September 2009 08:59:54 UTC