W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > September 2009

RE: video aspect use case

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:35:05 -0400 (EDT)
To: Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>
cc: 'RaphaŽl Troncy' <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>, 'Philip Jšgenstedt' <philipj@opera.com>, public-media-fragment@w3.org
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0909100533110.9634@wnl.j3.bet>
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Davy Van Deursen wrote:

> What I wanted to say is that, in my view, a different aspect ratio of a
> media resource is not a fragment (but a version). Since our task is to
> identify media fragments, I think aspect ratio is out of our scope.
> Similarly, we do not consider spatial, quality, or temporal scaling.

Well, we support clipping, which is roughly equivalent (apect ratio 
adaptation 'done right' is more than just clipping, it's more adaptative 
clipping), anyway if people want to drop this, I won't stand in the way.

-- 
Baroula que barouleras, au tiťu toujou t'entourneras.

         ~~Yves
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2009 09:35:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:34 GMT