W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > September 2009

RE: Range syntax

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 16:38:25 -0400 (EDT)
To: Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>
cc: public-media-fragment@w3.org, 'Jack Jansen' <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0909091635300.8146@wnl.j3.bet>
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Davy Van Deursen wrote:

>> hard to define the duration in the Content-Range: case.
>> Jack, Davy, what's your opinion on this?
>
> Why would it be hard to define this duration? If the resource does not begin
> at point zero, then this timing information must be present within the
> resource. Therefore, the server will always be able to calculate the correct
> duration of the returned fragment IMO.

Within the resource yes, but if only the fragment is served... That's 
another problem, as the duration in the Content-Range: is the one of the 
whole resource, not the fragment.
Cheers,

-- 
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

         ~~Yves
Received on Wednesday, 9 September 2009 20:38:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:34 GMT