W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > September 2009

Re: Range syntax

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 08:42:33 -0400 (EDT)
To: RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
cc: public-media-fragment@w3.org
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0909090836520.9101@wnl.j3.bet>
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, RaphaŽl Troncy wrote:

> With this option, one could then express a Range request, for example, for a 
> time interval where the start time would be expressed in npt and the end time 
> in smpte-30. Is this what you call 'flexibility'? I'm afraid that it also 
> adds extra-complexity which is not really required. As you say, this solution 
> has also the drawback of we cannot use Accept-Ranges.

Yes flexible, but dangerous ;) But it's a way to cope with the duration 
issue in the smpte case (if it exists)

> Question: is it possible to have multiple values for the Accept-Ranges 
> header? I can see that:
> Accept-Ranges: none
> Accept-Ranges: bytes
> are valid!
It's none or a comma separated list of units.
And two headers like that may fold in one using a comma separated list.

Baroula que barouleras, au tiťu toujou t'entourneras.

Received on Wednesday, 9 September 2009 12:42:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:43 UTC