W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > September 2009

Re: fragment or sub-resources

From: RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:52:46 +0200
Message-ID: <4AA61B5E.2060805@cwi.nl>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
CC: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, public-media-fragment@w3.org
> The problem that we have is: without the "Link" header, there is no 
> relationship between the two resources. With the "Link" header, it's 
> almost the same as with the fragment and it turns from an unrelated 
> resource into a sub-resource / child resource / derived resource.

I like the term 'derived' resource. I actually used it in my previous 
emails. I believe this term has not yet been over-used and its semantics 
should not be too misleading.

   RaphaŽl

-- 
RaphaŽl Troncy
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
2229, route des CrÍtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 8 September 2009 09:46:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:34 GMT