- From: Guillaume Olivrin <golivrin@meraka.org.za>
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:37:41 +0200
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Hi Silvia, It was Raphael review of UCs that prompted me to remove references to "primary" and "secondary" resources. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2008Nov/0044.html I removed only two instances of "secondary resource": 1. ** Unique resource WAS We want to try to specify media fragments as a secondary resource for the complete primary media resource. -- CURRENT We want to specify media fragments as usable parts of a resource. One media fragment therefore * is not seen as a separate resource BUT it is uniquely addressable * is not a "secondary resource" but a selective view of an entire resource. 2. ** Parent Resource WAS We want to try to make it possible to access the primary resource (i.e. the "context" of the fragment) through a simple change of the URI for the secondary resource. --- CURRENT We want to make it possible to access the entire resource as the "context" of a fragment via a simple change of the URI. This URI is a selective view of the resource provides a mechanism to focus on a fragment whilst hinting at the wider media context in which the fragment is included. I also removed instances of "primary resource" where they occurred. Hope it helps you revert some of the changes. Regards, Guillaume
Received on Thursday, 12 March 2009 07:02:44 UTC