W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > March 2009

Re: Use Cases and Requirements Wiki page updated

From: Guillaume Olivrin <golivrin@meraka.org.za>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:37:41 +0200
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1236839861.6618.9.camel@video-lab>
Hi Silvia,

It was Raphael review of UCs that prompted me to remove references to
"primary" and "secondary" resources. 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2008Nov/0044.html 

I removed only two instances of "secondary resource":

1.
** Unique resource
WAS
We want to try to specify media fragments as a secondary resource for
the complete primary media resource.
--
CURRENT
We want to specify media fragments as usable parts of a resource. One
media fragment therefore
* is not seen as a separate resource BUT it is uniquely addressable
* is not a "secondary resource" but a selective view of an entire
resource.


2.
** Parent Resource 
WAS
We want to try to make it possible to access the primary resource (i.e.
the "context" of the fragment) through a simple change of the URI for
the secondary resource.
---
CURRENT
We want to make it possible to access the entire resource as the
"context" of a fragment via a simple change of the URI. 
This URI is a selective view of the resource provides a mechanism to
focus on a fragment whilst hinting at the wider media context in which
the fragment is included.


I also removed instances of "primary resource" where they occurred.

Hope it helps you revert some of the changes.

Regards,
Guillaume
Received on Thursday, 12 March 2009 07:02:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:32 GMT