On 27-Jan-2009, at 23:44 , Yves Lafon wrote: > For me we should stick to fragments only when the returned content > would have the same mime type as the original, and another URI for a > "fragment" (in the video/audio/whatever content meaning of > "fragment") of the main resource in another mime type. In that case, > using a Link: header to indicate that it is a sub-part of a bigger > resource would be the easier way of giving the information to the > client. +1. -- Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma GoldmanReceived on Tuesday, 27 January 2009 22:59:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 January 2009 22:59:18 GMT