W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Action-28: updated syntax document with time formats

From: Conrad Parker <conrad@metadecks.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:39:04 +1100
Message-ID: <dba6c0830902041639u6485ee6fvcd826eab1e849382@mail.gmail.com>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>

2009/2/5 Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>:
> I totally agree with not using a single colon as a separator. I just
> thought that it would make sense to specify in a URL which time scheme
> we are using (as we did in the temporal URIs). However, if there is
> already a widespread consensus on specifying time scheme changes by
> using different characters, then we may as well use that. I am only
> afraid that people will make mistakes easily.

In the avid cmx syntax as I understand it, the frame separator is not
used to signify which time scheme is used, but to signify which field
of an interlaced frame is used in an edit.

The syntax that Jack wrote on the wiki does include the timescheme
name (just as we have for temporal URIs).

Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 00:39:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:42 UTC