W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > December 2009

Re: !Last phonecall before publication (be part of it)! - Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 16 December, Telecon 1000 UTC

From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:39:53 +0100
Message-ID: <4B26BEB9.2010204@w3.org>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
CC: erik mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>


Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
> Hi Thierry, all,
> 
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
>> Eric,
>>
>>
>> I have checked the 2 documents which are to be published next Thrusday.
>> There are a few issues which must be updated for the webmaster to publish
>> the documents in TR space.
> 
> You know you can edit the document, too..? :-)


Sure I was about to do so. But editing the 
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/

is not the best idea. It is better to update the XML editor's copy in 
http://dev.w3.org/
(to avoid getting these errors next publication).

and I am not aware of the latest URI. Therefore I have sent the things 
to fix.

Also see my responses inline.

Once the document is frozen I can do the fixes before publication on the 
HTML file.

Best Thierry.


> 
> 
>> For the Media Fragments 1.0
>> ------------------------------
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/
>>
>>
>>
>> * Date must be changed to
>> W3C Working Draft 17 December 2009
> 
> DONE.
> 
> 
>> * This version URI must be changed to
>>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-media-frags-20091217
> 
> I wouldn't know how to do that.

I will do that
> 
> 
>> * There is an HTML error, a <DIV> issue,  see
>> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/
> 
> FIXED.
> 
> 
>> * There is a broken link,
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-FPWD/tbd-diff2009xxxx.html
>> at Line: 69
> 
> This is the diff file to previous changes. Since we haven't published
> anything yet, I don't think we need this.

But this is a *first* publication. There is no diff file to previous 
changes. This should be removed.


> 
> 
>> Pubrules checkers [1] says that
>>
>> It MUST include this text related to patent policy requirements (with
>> suitable links inserted; see guidelines for linking to disclosure pages):
>>
>> Include this source code:
>> <p> This document was produced by a group operating under the <a
>> href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/">5 February 2004
>> W3C Patent Policy</a>. W3C maintains a <a rel="disclosure" href="@@URI to
>> IPP status or other page@@">public list of any patent disclosures</a> made
>> in connection with the deliverables of the group; that page also includes
>> instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who has actual knowledge
>> of a patent which the individual believes contains <a
>> href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#def-essential">Essential
>> Claim(s)</a> must disclose the information in accordance with <a
>> href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Disclosure">section
>> 6 of the W3C Patent Policy</a>. </p>
> 
> So, should this replace the following paragraph in the introduction?:

Right. I will do it.

> 
> This document was produced by a group operating under the  5 February
> 2004 W3C Patent Policy. The group does not expect this document to
> become a W3C Recommendation. W3C maintains a  public list of any
> patent disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of the
> group; that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent.
> An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the
> individual believes contains  Essential Claim(s) must disclose the
> information in accordance with  section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy.
> 
> 
>> For the Media Fragments Reqs
>> ------------------------------
> 
> I didn't make any changes there - I thought we were not going to
> re-publish this document since it was already published?


I read this in Erik's email latest agenda, to publish the 2 documents.

> 
> Regards,
> Silvia.
Received on Monday, 14 December 2009 22:40:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:35 GMT