W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > December 2009

Re: !Last phonecall before publication (be part of it)! - Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 16 December, Telecon 1000 UTC

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:17:29 +1100
Message-ID: <2c0e02830912141417w318ace8dtb8998ecf682da5ac@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
Cc: erik mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Hi Thierry, all,

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
> Eric,
>
>
> I have checked the 2 documents which are to be published next Thrusday.
> There are a few issues which must be updated for the webmaster to publish
> the documents in TR space.

You know you can edit the document, too..? :-)


> For the Media Fragments 1.0
> ------------------------------
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/
>
>
>
> * Date must be changed to
> W3C Working Draft 17 December 2009

DONE.


> * This version URI must be changed to
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-media-frags-20091217

I wouldn't know how to do that.


> * There is an HTML error, a <DIV> issue,  see
> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/

FIXED.


> * There is a broken link,
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-FPWD/tbd-diff2009xxxx.html
> at Line: 69

This is the diff file to previous changes. Since we haven't published
anything yet, I don't think we need this.


> Pubrules checkers [1] says that
>
> It MUST include this text related to patent policy requirements (with
> suitable links inserted; see guidelines for linking to disclosure pages):
>
> Include this source code:
> <p> This document was produced by a group operating under the <a
> href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/">5 February 2004
> W3C Patent Policy</a>. W3C maintains a <a rel="disclosure" href="@@URI to
> IPP status or other page@@">public list of any patent disclosures</a> made
> in connection with the deliverables of the group; that page also includes
> instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who has actual knowledge
> of a patent which the individual believes contains <a
> href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#def-essential">Essential
> Claim(s)</a> must disclose the information in accordance with <a
> href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Disclosure">section
> 6 of the W3C Patent Policy</a>. </p>

So, should this replace the following paragraph in the introduction?:

This document was produced by a group operating under the  5 February
2004 W3C Patent Policy. The group does not expect this document to
become a W3C Recommendation. W3C maintains a  public list of any
patent disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of the
group; that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent.
An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the
individual believes contains  Essential Claim(s) must disclose the
information in accordance with  section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy.


> For the Media Fragments Reqs
> ------------------------------

I didn't make any changes there - I thought we were not going to
re-publish this document since it was already published?


Regards,
Silvia.
Received on Monday, 14 December 2009 22:18:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:35 GMT