W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > December 2009

Re: Minor comment wrt publishing your drafts

From: RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:57:25 +0100
Message-ID: <4B159145.9010707@cwi.nl>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
CC: public-media-fragment@w3.org
Dear Fantasai,

Thanks for your comments.
>   a) Having an editor's draft posing as an official W3C Working Draft
>      is confusing. Please use the Editor's Draft style sheet and status,
>      at least until you have a resolution to publish and are waiting for
>      webreq to act. (An example of an Editor's Draft can be found here:
>      <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/>.)

I agree with that and sorry for the confusion. The main problem is that 
XMLSpec does not support this style sheet. I think we will move away 
from using XMLSpec for generating the documents and therefore will be 
able to use this specific style sheet for Editor's Draft.

>   b) I think putting 'spec' in your shortname is a waste of URL space.
>      We're in the business of publishing specs: that's what we put
>      in the /TR space. Just call it /TR/media-fragments/. It's friendlier
>      and less redundant. Imho.

Indeed, this has been discussed during our last telecon [1]. The group 
agrees to drop the "-spec" as short name but keep the suffix for the 
other documents (e.g. "-req").
Best regards.

   RaphaŽl

[1] http://www.w3.org/2009/11/25-mediafrag-minutes.html#item02

-- 
RaphaŽl Troncy
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
2229, route des CrÍtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 21:58:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:35 GMT