W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > August 2009

Re: feedback on use cases and requirements

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:29:01 +1000
Message-ID: <2c0e02830908260129y51f4dc91l58a4b77d564fbeae@mail.gmail.com>
To: RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
Cc: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
2009/8/26 RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>

> Hi Silvia,
>
>  To make some progress, I have just gone ahead and done it.
>> I have used the SMIL3 specification rather than what HTML5 proposes. HTML5
>> includes the SMIL specification, but also has specifications for a week
>> string (which specifices work weeks in the year).
>>
>
> Great, thanks!
> I have read the new section "4.3.1.3 Wall-clock time code", it's perfect. I
> have sync the wiki page with the formal grammar in the spec, see:
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Syntax#Formal_Grammar
> Yves, could you please also update the piece of code in the code/ directory
> of the Media Fragments web space?
>
> I note that we are not totally consistent in the way we wrote the formal
> grammar: sometimes we write "1*DIGIT" while sometimes just "2DIGIT". This is
> details, but perhaps we should just be consistent.


It's correct, see http://www.tech-invite.com/Ti-abnf.html .



> BTW: somebody should put a reference into HTML5 that their dates-and-times
> spec is based on SMIL3.
>

Yep, perhaps you could email this either directly Ian or the HTML5/WHATWG
> mailing lists.


Nah - he hasn't done references yet and I think somebody from SMIL should
track this when it's time.

Cheers,
Silvia.
Received on Wednesday, 26 August 2009 08:30:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:34 GMT