W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > April 2009

Re: Review of section 8

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:00:47 +1000
Message-ID: <2c0e02830904140800p7be103d6xbd669aa93e1896ca@mail.gmail.com>
To: RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>, Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>, Erik Mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>
2009/4/15 RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>:
>>> "???" meant to be "..." for reflecting the complete definition of the
>>> polygon.
>>
>> If it's a polygon, it could be any point. None of the given points
>> line up with each other, so I don't think there is a clear way to work
>> out what the missing point is supposed to be. May I suggest using
>> something more obvious like (40, 300), (40,210), (???), (320,300) -
>> then the missing point is obivously (320, 210). Or am I
>> misunderstanding coordinates?
>
> 1/ The MPEG-7 syntax has no parenthesis.
> 2/ This is a polygon of arbitrary shape, that can have 50 points to be
> defined. The "..." means all the points that might be used to define the
> polygon.

Oh! How is the computer supposed to interpret that?
/me is still very confused

Silvia.
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 15:01:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:33 GMT