W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > April 2009

Re: Naming suggestion: single/dual roundtrip for 2-way/4-way handshake

From: RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:12:51 +0200
Message-ID: <49E44583.4070105@cwi.nl>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
CC: Conrad Parker <conrad@metadecks.org>, Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Dear all,

> I've just read up on the HTTP protocol and "partial GET". How about
> using "single-step partial GET" and "dual-step partial GET request"
> for 2-way and 4-way handshake?

Thanks for these additional suggestions. I agree that "partial GET" 
captures what we want to say. I have changed the phrasing of our 
sections accordingly adopting these 2 expressions, and I have deleted my 
previous editorial note.

   RaphaŽl

-- 
RaphaŽl Troncy
CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science),
Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands
e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093
Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312
Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 08:21:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:33 GMT