W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > October 2008

Re: SMIL section of state-of-the-art document done

From: RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:37:48 +0100
Message-ID: <4905C42C.4060403@cwi.nl>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
CC: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>

>> Also note that <area> *must* use ltrb-style to be consistent: if the shape
>> is a polygon you must specify x0,y0,x1,y1,x2,y2, ... anyway, so if you don't
>> do a point pair for a rectangle (but in stead a point, size pair) things
>> become messy.
> I see where you're coming from. I'd still prefer having just one
> parameter and however many values we need after that to keep it
> compact in a URI. But that's just me and up for discussion. :-)

Need to think more about the problem, but naturally, I would prefer to 
have everything explicit, which means, Jack's solution of naming out all 
properties used for defining the rectangle. The single parameter with 
with a comma separated values list has the major disadvantage of 
embedding implicit semantics, i.e., you _have to_ know for each values 
to what they correspond.
My 2c.


RaphaŽl Troncy
CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science),
Kruislaan 413, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093
Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312
Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
Received on Monday, 27 October 2008 14:01:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:41 UTC