W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > October 2008

Re: SMIL section of state-of-the-art document done

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:11:06 +1100
Message-ID: <2c0e02830810270411p4a32b791r13746dfd38f67a76@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jack Jansen" <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
Cc: "Media Fragment" <public-media-fragment@w3.org>

Wow, that's totally awesome. I am inspired to write the CMML/Annodex section. :)

BTW: I like the quadruple way of specifying a spatial fragment (area)
in SMIL: x-offset, y-offset, width, height. We should consider using
that for spatial media fragment URIs.

Cheers,
Silvia.

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl> wrote:
>
> I've finally managed to fill the SMIL section of the state-of-the-art
> technology document on the wiki
> <http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/State_of_the_Art>.
>
> I think i've pretty much followed the outline we talked about at the f2f,
> let me know if I've missed something. Oh yeah: the media item exists (it's
> the one we recorded at the f2f) and the fragment I'm using in the examples
> is indeed the relevant fragment.
>
> I'll try to find the time to actually put all the example code into a single
> SMIL presentation, so people can actually see this in action too (assuming
> it doesn't trigger a whole batch of Ambulant bugs:-).
> --
> Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack
> If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 27 October 2008 11:11:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:31 GMT