- From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:39:08 +0000
- To: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- CC: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 2016-02-10 13:46, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote: > On 10/02/16 10:34, Martin Thomson wrote: >> On 10 February 2016 at 20:26, Stefan Håkansson LK >> <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: >>> Where did you get that figure? I noted that the "floating proposal" has >>> some data, but there is no data for gUM and iFrames. >> >> Yes, that data is purely generic from what I can see. I didn't mean >> to imply that it applied to gUM. >> >>> One thought that struck me: would explicit delegation also apply to >>> same-origin iFrames? >> >> Well, that's a part that #313 doesn't cover and it should. A >> same-origin iframe can just reach out and access its parent's DOM, so >> any restriction is pointless. The permissions delegation option has >> same-origin iframes gain permissions automatically. > > I agree to this. I've updated #313 to only enforce the need for "allowed to access user media" in the case of cross-origin iframes. /Adam
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2016 14:39:40 UTC