W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > February 2016

Re: [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Extend iframe with a new allowusermedia attribute (issue: #268)

From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:46:50 +0000
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
CC: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B37482315@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
On 10/02/16 10:34, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 10 February 2016 at 20:26, Stefan Håkansson LK
> <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> Where did you get that figure? I noted that the "floating proposal" has
>> some data, but there is no data for gUM and iFrames.
>
> Yes, that data is purely generic from what I can see.  I didn't mean
> to imply that it applied to gUM.
>
>> One thought that struck me: would explicit delegation also apply to
>> same-origin iFrames?
>
> Well, that's a part that #313 doesn't cover and it should.  A
> same-origin iframe can just reach out and access its parent's DOM, so
> any restriction is pointless.  The permissions delegation option has
> same-origin iframes gain permissions automatically.

I agree to this.

>
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2016 12:47:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 10 February 2016 12:47:22 UTC