[mediacapture-main] New permission definitions are wrong.

jan-ivar has just created a new issue for 
https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main:

== New permission definitions are wrong. ==
Sorry for not becoming aware of this sooner, but it's deeply 
concerning to me that we seem to recently have tied ourselves to the 
definitions in the document describing the web-facing Permissions API,
 which seems primarily to be about how web pages can view the state of
 *persistent permissions* (`'prompt'`/`'granted'`/`'denied'`).

That whole spec is built on that triumvirate of states, making it 
inherently suited for requesting the state of persistent permissions 
only. They're necessarily persistent, because permission absent 
context needs to persist for some length of time, as it's not tied to 
anything else, like a successfully requested object.

This seems like an impedance mismatch for our needs. Our spec needs 
definitions for *request for access*, which we should be careful not 
to confuse with *request for (persistent) permission*. This is perhaps
 most obvious with the state 
[`'prompt'`](https://www.w3.org/TR/permissions/#idl-def-PermissionState-prompt),
 which means the user gets a prompt *when they later request access*.

Clearly *request for access* must be separate from *request for 
permission* or there's a circular definition, yet their *request for 
permission* algorithm just returns the aforementioned triumvirate (I 
pick apart that algorithm in 
https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/85#issuecomment-213434671).

Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/issues/350 using your GitHub 
account

Received on Monday, 25 April 2016 16:22:53 UTC