W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > November 2015

Re: Mediacapture-fromelement: Does capturing a stream from a canvas make sense?

From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 21:42:30 +0100
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5650D736.8060609@alvestrand.no>
On 11/20/2015 05:50 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 20 November 2015 at 04:50, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
>> On rethinking the issue, I think returning a wrapper (the stream) with
>> one element isn't so very objectionable to me, but defining extensions
>> to the wrapper for functions that only affect the track is something I
>> definitely don't like, and I would like to have it changes.
> I'm happy if that's the conclusion and we move requestFrame() to the track.
I could live with that.

The two mods to MediaStream are adding requestFrame() and the reference
to the source canvas.
Can we move both?

-- 
Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
Received on Saturday, 21 November 2015 20:43:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 21 November 2015 20:43:04 UTC