W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > November 2015

Re: Mediacapture-fromelement: Does capturing a stream from a canvas make sense?

From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 21:42:30 +0100
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5650D736.8060609@alvestrand.no>
On 11/20/2015 05:50 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 20 November 2015 at 04:50, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
>> On rethinking the issue, I think returning a wrapper (the stream) with
>> one element isn't so very objectionable to me, but defining extensions
>> to the wrapper for functions that only affect the track is something I
>> definitely don't like, and I would like to have it changes.
> I'm happy if that's the conclusion and we move requestFrame() to the track.
I could live with that.

The two mods to MediaStream are adding requestFrame() and the reference
to the source canvas.
Can we move both?

Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
Received on Saturday, 21 November 2015 20:43:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 21 November 2015 20:43:04 UTC