Re: [mediacapture-depth] Editor's Draft updated, call for review

On 13/05/15 9:05 PM, Kostiainen, Anssi wrote:
> [We initially looked at reusing mediacapture-image for this, but felt
> that would have required us to do drastic changes to that API. Also,
> we felt the mediacapture-image spec was designed to address a
> different set of requirements. In particular, reliance on the rAF or
> setInterval for repeated grabbing of frames was seen problematic from
> the mediacapture-depth point of view.]

BTW: Giri, thanks for taking the time to respond to our 
feedback/questions about the mediacapture-image API a while back. 
Apologies for not responding earlier.

roBman

Received on Monday, 18 May 2015 09:08:51 UTC