- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 15:59:16 +0200
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@chromium.org>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>, public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:48 PM, <dom@w3.org> wrote: > Please review it carefully [...] > > Your comment on enumerateDevices(): >> == enumerateDevices should be getAll() to match other APIs == >> ```mediaDevices.getAll()``` is pretty clear and matches other APIs >> like the Cache API in SW. > > Working Group Resolution (LC-3010): > The Working Group does not contemplate any change based on this comment. Did the Working Group even review the comment carefully? These kind of templated non-responses kill public contributions and participation (or in this case contributions from engineers with lots of experience in API design). -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 7 July 2015 13:59:41 UTC