Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat from Anne van Kesteren on 2014-10-07 (public-media-capture@w3.org from October 2014)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 17:20:41 +0200
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CADnb78i+L6pFs1cnM0+Pb_gHjoc+AQmk3HwkM=s-WVKF-wWiRQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
> It could be, but at the cost of inconveniencing users in the name of
> specification purity.

navigator.getUserMedia(), unprefixed, never shipped in any
implementation. Removing it therefore does not inconvenience
developers. What implementations do with their proprietary
implementations is up to them. And implementations having proprietary
implementations should not put pressure on the specification process
(unless it turns out we have to standardize one of the prefixed
variants, but that seems unlikely long term).

-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2014 15:21:09 UTC