- From: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 11:31:16 -0400
- To: Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com>, public-media-capture@w3.org
On 5/18/14 12:07 PM, Jim Barnett wrote: > I agree with Martin. If the author says that 'foo' is required, then > doesn't specify it. Furthermore, the fact that the constraint is > missing is how we detect unsupported mandatory constraints. If the UA > doesn't support the 'height' attribute, and the author specifies it in > a mandatory constraint with 'require', the situation will look to the > UA just like the one described in the bug. Actually, turns out I was wrong. The UA doesn't actually require absent member to fail to detect unsupported constraints, since it knows exactly what it supports and doesn't support already (this became clear once I implemented it). So I think I agree with Cullen here. .: Jan-Ivar :.
Received on Monday, 19 May 2014 15:31:53 UTC