W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > June 2014

Re: Adding "Media Capture Depth Stream Extensions" as TF deliverable

From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 06:19:21 +0000
To: Rob Manson <roBman@buildAR.com>
CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6E104477-31F6-4619-AE46-C00A2345F044@intel.com>
Hi Rob, All,

On 10 Jun 2014, at 03:41, Rob Manson <roBman@buildAR.com> wrote:

> On 6/06/14 6:41 PM, Kostiainen, Anssi wrote:
>> Rob, All - please review the PR [1] and send any comments to this list. I’ll incorporate any changes before merging.
> 
> I added a comment for a small typo on line 132. Other than that it looks good to me 8)

Rob - thanks for the review. I fixed the typo and merged the pull request.

The introduction and Terminology have now been updated based on your feedback:

https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-depth/#introduction
https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-depth/#terminology

Changes:

https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-depth/pull/6/files

>>> >Also, have we defined more info about the "nature and settings of the depth track" that we mention in the constraints section?
>> This is definitely something that we should clarify, and actually, there’s an open issue for this [2].
>> 
>> Rob - would you be interested in expanding this part of the spec?
> 
> Sure thing. Looks like there's an update on the constraints/capabilities being made to the spec now so I'll wait for that to be updated and then create a draft that matches that.

Sounds good. Feel free to add a new issue for this, and note that we’re pending for the gUM spec to reach consensus on the constraints/capabilities. I propose we continue use the GH issues, unless someone shouts:

https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-depth/issues

Thanks,

-Anssi
Received on Tuesday, 10 June 2014 06:19:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:24:48 UTC