- From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 18:19:39 -0400
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
I'll flip this on its head: why do you want to deny permissions when the page is reloaded? What are you protecting the user from? :) Gili On 02/06/2014 5:27 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 2 June 2014 14:14, Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com> wrote: >> All I'm asking for is a form of permissions that survive a page reload, but >> don't last forever. > Yeah, so I'm saying that would be unacceptable. > >> If permanent permissions are possible (and presumably >> don't involve massively disruptive architectural changes), why aren't less >> permanent ones also possible? Just a bit of book-keeping in the UA, I >> would think. > That's not the concern. We can implement just about any sort of > well-defined persistence you can dream up. That's never been the > concern. > > Maybe you can more clearly articulate what you want, and why. >
Received on Monday, 2 June 2014 22:20:26 UTC